Key result
Antithrombotic use during musculoskeletal injections or aspirations resulted in no clinically significant bleeding, with local bruising reported in 8.6% of users versus 0.2% of non-users.
Why the study?
Limited safety evidence exists to support injection decisions and peri-procedural management during musculoskeletal injections or aspirations in people on anti-thrombotics, particularly direct oral anticoagulants.
Does the use of antithrombotic therapy increase the risk of clinically significant bleeding events following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations?
Observational (n=1,338)
Yes
Does the use of antithrombotic therapy increase the risk of clinically significant bleeding events following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.6% vs 0.2%
May support continuing antithrombotics for musculoskeletal procedures; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections and aspirations are common interventions for managing musculoskeletal and inflammatory conditions. However, there remains limited safety evidence to support injection decisions and peri-procedural management in people on anti-thrombotics, particularly for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). OBJECTIVES: To investigate peri-procedural management and bleeding complications following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations with anti-thrombotic medication use. DESIGN: A prospective observational study was undertaken (October 2018-December 2020) in Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Radiology specialities in two large UK healthcare providers. Data collection involved weekly identification of musculoskeletal procedures, emergency attendance or admission within 30 days and follow-up questionnaires sent within 2 weeks post-procedure. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse anticoagulant/anti-platelet use, peri-procedural management and bleeding complications. RESULTS: Of 5080 procedures, 237 of 1338 responses reported antithrombotic use: warfarin (n = 36), DOACs (n = 75) and antiplatelets (n = 126). There were no self-report or electronic identification of clinically significant bleeding events/complications. Only local bruising was reported (8.6% vs. 0.2% with non-use), and only with medication continuation or international normalised ratio (INR) levels ≥3.8 or unknown. Only 3/72 DOAC use was interrupted. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, no clinically significant bleeding events or complications were reported or identified following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations, with only localised bruising reported. It was not universal practice to check INR levels and DOAC interruption was uncommon. Findings add evidence that musculoskeletal procedures appear to be low risk procedures for bleeding complications with antithrombotic continuation and when INR levels within lower target range. Research on intra-articular or soft tissue iatrogenic consequences would add to risk/benefit evaluations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCrum et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Musculoskeletal and inflammatory conditions (n=1,338). Antithrombotic medication (warfarin, DOACs, antiplatelets) vs. Non-use of antithrombotics was evaluated on Local bruising. Antithrombotic use during musculoskeletal injections or aspirations resulted in no clinically significant bleeding, with local bruising reported in 8.6% of users versus 0.2% of non-users.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: