Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores binding interactions of uridine mimetics in biochemical applications, suggesting enhanced efficacy.
Uridine (U) mimetics are sought after as tools for biochemical and pharmacological studies. Previously, we have identified recognition patterns of U by proteins. Here, we targeted the characterization of uridine mimetics—cyanuryl-ribose (CR), barbituryl-ribose (BR), and 6-azauridine (AU)—with a view to identify analogs with potentially more binding interactions than U with target biomolecules. We found that CR, BR, and AU retain selective U’s natural H-bonds with adenosine vs guanosine. CR/AU and BR were 100- and 10,000-fold more acidic, respectively, than U. Under physiological pH, 54, 51, and 77% of CR, AU, and BR molecules, respectively, are ionized vs 13% for U. The electron-rich nature of CR and BR vs U was reflected by their 13C NMR chemical shifts and ε values. CR/AU and BR prefer N conformation (up to 73%) vs U (56%). Unlike U that prefers gg conformation around exocyclic methylol (48%), CR/AU and BR prefer both gt and gg rotamers. In conclusion, replacement of uridine’s C6 by N or carbonyl, or C5–C6 by an amide, results in significant changes in U’s ionization, electron density, conformation, base-stacking, etc., leading to potentially tighter binding than U with a target protein or nucleic acid and potential use for various biochemical and pharmacological applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salameh et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: