Key result
Control angiography for perioperative myocardial ischemia after CABG was associated with a pooled early mortality of 8.9%, compared to 43.6% in patients undergoing reoperation without prior angiography.
Why the study?
Does control angiography reduce early mortality in patients with perioperative myocardial ischemia after CABG?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,104)
Does control angiography reduce early mortality in patients with perioperative myocardial ischemia after CABG?
Control angiography is associated with lower early mortality compared to blind reoperation and serves as a valid strategy to guide repeat revascularization in patients with perioperative myocardial ischemia after CABG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports angiography-guided revascularization in post-CABG perioperative ischemia; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of mortality benefit.
BACKGROUND: Perioperative myocardial ischemia (PMI) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with poor outcome. The aim of this study was to pool the available data on the outcome after control angiography and repeat revascularization in patients with perioperative myocardial ischemia (PMI) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: A literature review was performed through PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar to identify studies published since 1990 evaluating the outcome of PMI after CABG. RESULTS: Nine studies included 1104 patients with PMI after CABG and 1056 of them underwent control angiography early after CABG. Pooled early mortality after reoperation for PMI without control angiography was 43.6% (95%CI 29.7-57.6%) and 79.8% of them (95%CI 64.4-95.2%) had an acute graft failure detected at reoperation. Among patients who underwent control angiography for PMI, 31.7% had a negative finding at angiography (95%CI 25.6-37.8%) and 62.1% had an acute graft failure (95%CI 56.6-67.6%). Repeat revascularization was performed after early control angiography in 46.3% of patients (95%CI 39.9-52.6%; 54.2% underwent repeat surgical revascularization; 45.8% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention). Pooled early mortality after control angiography with or without repeat revascularization was 8.9% (95%CI 6.7-11.1%). Three studies reported on early mortality rates which did not differ between repeat surgical revascularization and PCI (11.7% vs. 9.2%, respectively; risk ratio 1.45, 95%CI 0.67-3.11). In these three series, early mortality after conservative treatment was 5.9% (95%CI 3.6-8.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Control angiography seems to be a valid life-saving strategy to guide repeat revascularization in hemodynamically stable patients suffering PMI after CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biancari et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis in Perioperative myocardial ischemia after CABG (n=1,104). Control angiography vs. Reoperation without control angiography was evaluated on In-hospital/30-day mortality. Control angiography for perioperative myocardial ischemia after CABG was associated with a pooled early mortality of 8.9%, compared to 43.6% in patients undergoing reoperation without prior angiography.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: