Key result
Male patients with T2DM and acute cerebrovascular disease had a significantly higher adjusted risk of total intracranial plaque burden compared to females (RR 1.261; 95% CI 1.050-1.515; P=0.013).
Why the study?
The relationship between sex differences, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerosis is not fully understood.
Are there sex differences in intracranial plaque burden among patients with T2DM and acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease?
Observational (n=120)
Are there sex differences in intracranial plaque burden among patients with T2DM and acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease?
Relative Risk: 1.261 (95% CI 1.05–1.515)
p-value: p=0.013
May warrant sex-stratified ICAS monitoring in T2DM stroke; leaves open whether antidiabetic treatment modifies proximal plaque risk differently by sex.
Background: Atherosclerosis (AS) is the main cause of macrovascular disease. Previous studies have found sex differences in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its associated macrovascular disease outcomes. However, the relationship between sex differences, T2DM, and AS is not fully understood. This study attempts to explore possible associations between sex, treatment, and the burden of intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) in patients with T2DM who have experienced an acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Methods: We focused on patients with T2DM with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. ICAS was assessed by 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance vascular wall imaging. Plaque counts of the total, proximal, and distal intracranial arteries were used to assess plaque burden. Patients with a history of T2DM and currently taking hypoglycemic drugs were defined as being treated. Poisson regression models or negative binomial regression models were used to analyze the interaction between sex and treatment in relation to plaque burden. Results: A total of 495 plaques were detected in 120 patients (75 male; mean age, 60.77 ± 11.01 years), including 311 proximal and 184 distal plaques. The intracranial culprit plaque was located proximal to the artery in both male (85.3%) and female (88.9%) patients. The adjusted total and proximal intracranial plaque burdens were 1.261 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.050-1.515, P=0.013) and 1.322 times (95%CI, 1.055-1.682, P=0.016) higher in male than in female patients. The risk ratio for proximal plaque burden in untreated male versus female patients was 0.966 (95%CI, 0.704-1.769). However, the proximal plaque risk ratio for treated male versus female patients was 1.530 (95%CI, 1.076-2.174). The interaction of sex and treatment significantly affected the proximal plaque burden. Conclusion: Male patients with T2DM and acute cerebrovascular disease have a significantly higher adjusted risk of total and proximal intracranial plaque burden compared to female patients. Female patients undergoing antidiabetic treatment have a significantly reduced risk of proximal plaque to males. Considering that culprit plaques tend to accumulate in the proximal arteries, understanding how to reduce the burden of proximal plaques may help reduce the risk of adverse cerebrovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus with acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease (n=120). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Total intracranial plaque burden (RR 1.261, 95% CI 1.050-1.515, p=0.013). Male patients with T2DM and acute cerebrovascular disease had a significantly higher adjusted risk of total intracranial plaque burden compared to females (RR 1.261; 95% CI 1.050-1.515; P=0.013).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: