Key result
The HIP HELPER caregiver training programme was acceptable following hip fracture surgery, with 11% of eligible patients consenting to randomization and 48% of the intervention group reaching compliance.
Why the study?
To assess the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic multicentre RCT testing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an informal caregiver training programme to support recovery following hip fracture surgery.
Is a caregiver training programme (HIP HELPER) feasible and acceptable for community-dwelling adults following hip fracture surgery and their caregivers?
RCT (n=102)
Open-label
1:1 computer generated, stratified by hospital and cognitive impairment
Yes
Is a caregiver training programme (HIP HELPER) feasible and acceptable for community-dwelling adults following hip fracture surgery and their caregivers?
A caregiver training program for patients recovering from hip fracture surgery is acceptable, but trial design modifications are needed for a definitive RCT due to low consent and compliance rates.
Low consent and compliance rates caution against routine adoption; leaves open feasibility after trial redesign for efficacy testing.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an informal caregiver training programme to support the recovery of people following hip fracture surgery. DESIGN: Two-arm, multicentre, pragmatic, open, feasibility RCT with embedded qualitative study. SETTING: National Health Service (NHS) providers in five English hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults, aged 60 years and over, who undergo hip fracture surgery and their informal caregivers. INTERVENTION: Usual care: usual NHS care. EXPERIMENTAL: a caregiver-patient dyad training programme (HIP HELPER). This programme comprised three, 1 hour, one-to-one training sessions for a patient and caregiver, delivered by a nurse, physiotherapist or occupational therapist in the hospital setting predischarge. After discharge, patients and caregivers were supported through three telephone coaching sessions. RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING: Central randomisation was computer generated (1:1), stratified by hospital and level of patient cognitive impairment. There was no blinding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data collected at baseline and 4 months post randomisation included: screening logs, intervention logs, fidelity checklists, acceptability data and clinical outcomes. Interviews were conducted with a subset of participants and health professionals. RESULTS: 102 participants were enrolled (51 patients; 51 caregivers). Thirty-nine per cent (515/1311) of patients screened were eligible. Eleven per cent (56/515) of eligible patients consented to be randomised. Forty-eight per cent (12/25) of the intervention group reached compliance to their allocated intervention. There was no evidence of treatment contamination. Qualitative data demonstrated the trial and HIP HELPER programme was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The HIP HELPER programme was acceptable to patient-caregiver dyads and health professionals. The COVID-19 pandemic impacting on site's ability to deliver the research. Modifications are necessary to the design for a viable definitive RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13270387.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in hip fracture surgery (n=102). HIP HELPER caregiver-patient dyad training programme vs. Usual care was evaluated on Feasibility metrics including screening logs, intervention logs, fidelity checklists, acceptability data and clinical outcomes. The HIP HELPER caregiver training programme was acceptable following hip fracture surgery, with 11% of eligible patients consenting to randomization and 48% of the intervention group reaching compliance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: