Key result
CHOP chemotherapy resulted in a significantly higher overall complete response rate (49% vs 31%, P=0.03) and better 3-year survival (42% vs 26%) compared to CNOP in elderly patients with advanced NHL.
Why the study?
Does CHOP chemotherapy improve complete response and survival compared to CNOP in elderly patients with advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma?
Population
157 enrolled patients, elderly with advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of intermediate- and high-grade…
Comparison
CHOP chemotherapy vs CNOP chemotherapy
Design
RCT, randomized
Follow-up
3 years
Authors
Loading...
CHOP linked to higher CR and survival than CNOP in elderly advanced NHL; leaves open optimal modern regimens.
RCT (n=157)
Yes
Does CHOP chemotherapy improve complete response and survival compared to CNOP in elderly patients with advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma?
Absolute Event Rate: 49% vs 31%
p-value: p=0.03
Sonneveld et al. (1995) conducted an RCT in Advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=157). CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) vs. CNOP (mitoxantrone instead of doxorubicin) was evaluated on Overall complete response (CR) rate (p=0.03). CHOP chemotherapy resulted in a significantly higher overall complete response rate (49% vs 31%, P=0.03) and better 3-year survival (42% vs 26%) compared to CNOP in elderly patients with advanced NHL.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: