Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To evaluate the benefit of recombinant human growth hormone administration on muscle strength and duration of weaning in critically ill patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation. Design Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study. Setting Intensive care unit. Patients Twenty patients requiring > or = 7 days of mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Intervention Random assignment to receive either 0.43 IU (approximately 0.14 mg) recombinant growth hormone/kg body weight/day (treated group), or saline (nontreated group) for 12 days. Measurements and main results Nutritional support was guided by indirect calorimetry. Cumulative nitrogen balance was positive throughout the study period in the treated group 17.3 (44.9 +/- 17.3[SEM] g/12 days) vs. the nontreated group (-65.8 +/- 11.8 g/12 days) (p<.0001). Despite similar initial plasma concentrations, recombinant growth hormone supplementation resulted in marked increases in growth hormone, insulin like growth factor-1, and insulin concentrations (p<.05, .02, and .0001, respectively, vs. nontreated group). Body impedance determined net fat-free mass increased in the treated group (0.8 +/- 0.6 kg) vs. the nontreated group (-1.1 +/- O.5 kg) (p<.03). Initial peripheral muscle function, assessed by computer-controlled electrical stimulation of the adductor pollicis, was similarly lower in treated and nontreated groups than sex and age-matched normal controls, and decreased further during the study period. Arterial blood gases, cumulative total mechanical ventilation time, and number of hrs/day of mechanical ventilation during weaning were similar in both patient groups. Only three of the ten patients in each group were weaned from mechanical ventilation by day 12. Conclusions Daily administration of recombinant growth hormone in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure promotes a marked nitrogen retention. However, this reaction is accompanied neither by an improvement in muscle strength nor by a shorter duration of ventilatory supports.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pichard et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: