Key result
Neurostimulation is a potentially useful alternative treatment for refractory angina pectoris, though its safety needs to be sufficiently established.
Why the study?
Is neurostimulation an effective and safe alternative treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris?
Is neurostimulation an effective and safe alternative treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris?
Neurostimulation may be a useful alternative treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris who have exhausted medical and revascularization options.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support direct anti-atherosclerotic strategies in angina; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
The treatment of angina pectoris as a symptom of coronary artery disease usually is focused on restoring the balance between oxygen demand and supply of the myocardium by administration of drugs interfering in heart rate, cardiac pre- and afterload, and coronary vascular tone. For nonresponders to drug therapy or for those with jeopardized myocardium, revascularization procedures such as coronary bypass surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty are at hand. However, the atherosclerotic process is not stopped by these therapies and, at longer terms, angina may recur. It is not always possible to revascularize all the patients who do not positively react to medical treatment. Those with angina, not responding to adequate medication and who are not suitable anymore for revascularization, are considered to suffer from refractory angina pectoris. This group of patients has a poor quality of life, for their exercise tolerance is severely afflicted. For these patients, neurostimulation has been described repeatedly as an effective and safe therapy. The mechanism of action of neurostimulation is not completely known, but recent studies suggest an anti-ischemic effect, exerted through changes in myocardial blood flow. As soon as its safety is sufficiently established, it may become a useful alternative in the treatment of refractory angina pectoris.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hautvast et al. (1996) conducted a review in Refractory angina pectoris. Neurostimulation was evaluated. Neurostimulation is a potentially useful alternative treatment for refractory angina pectoris, though its safety needs to be sufficiently established.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: