Key result
In hypertensive patients, 3-year reductions in systolic (r=0.18, p=0.02) and diastolic (r=0.20, p=0.03) blood pressure variability independently predicted left ventricular mass index improvement.
Why the study?
Blood pressure variability has been linked to cardiovascular organ damage, but its association with hypertension-mediated organ damage regression after treatment initiation remains to be explored.
Does antihypertensive treatment-induced reduction in blood pressure variability improve hypertension-mediated organ damage in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients?
Cohort (n=180)
Does antihypertensive treatment-induced reduction in blood pressure variability improve hypertension-mediated organ damage in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients?
p-value: p=<0.001
In newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, achieving blood pressure control and reducing blood pressure variability over 3 years is associated with regression of left ventricular hypertrophy.
BPV reduction may link to HMOD regression; leaves open independent prognostic value and need for prospective trials.
Blood pressure variability (BPV) has been associated with the development, progression, and severity of cardiovascular (CV) organ damage and an increased risk of CV morbidity and mortality. We aimed to explore any association between short-term BPV reduction and hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) regression in hypertensive patients 3-year post-treatment initiation regarding BP control. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24 h ABPM) was performed at baseline in 180 newly diagnosed and never-treated hypertensive patients. We measured 24 h average systolic (24 h SBP) and diastolic BP (24 h DBP) as well as 24 h systolic (sBPV) and diastolic BPV (dBPV). Patients were initially evaluated and 3 years later regarding arterial stiffness (PWV), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVMI), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), 24 h microalbumin levels (MAU), and coronary flow reserve (CFR). Successful BP treatment was defined as 24 h SBP/DBP < 130/80 mm Hg based on 2nd ABPM and subsequently, patients were characterized as controlled (n = 119, age = 53 ± 11 years) or non-controlled (n = 61, age = 47 ± 11 years) regarding their BP levels. In the whole population and the controlled group, 24 h SBP/DBP, sBPV/dBPV, LVMI, and IMT were decreased. Additionally, LVMI improvement was related with both sBPV (p < .001) and dBPV reduction (r = .18, p = .02 and r = .20, p = .03, respectively). In non-controlled hypertensives, PWV was increased. In multiple linear regression analysis, sBPV and dBPV reduction predicted LVMI improvement in total population and controlled group independently of initial office SBP, mean BP, and 24 h-SBP levels. In middle-aged hypertensive patients, a 3-year antihypertensive treatment within normal BP limits, confirmed by 24-h ABPM, leads to CV risk reduction associated with sBPV and dBPV improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Triantafyllidi et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Essential hypertension (n=180). Successful blood pressure treatment (24 h SBP/DBP < 130/80 mm Hg) vs. Non-controlled blood pressure was evaluated on Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) improvement (p=<0.001). In hypertensive patients, 3-year reductions in systolic (r=0.18, p=0.02) and diastolic (r=0.20, p=0.03) blood pressure variability independently predicted left ventricular mass index improvement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: