Key result
An AI-derived radiomics risk score based on non-contrast chest CT significantly improved discrimination for incident MACE when added to the Pooled Cohort Equations (c-index 0.653 vs. 0.567).
Why the study?
Input variables for clinical cardiovascular risk scores are often missing in electronic health records, and structural features from routinely collected non-contrast chest CTs may offer added value for predicting MACE.
Does an AI-derived structural radiomics risk score from non-contrast chest CT improve prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to standard clinical risk scores in primary prevention patients?
Cohort (n=4,303)
Yes
Does an AI-derived structural radiomics risk score from non-contrast chest CT improve prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to standard clinical risk scores in primary prevention patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.653% vs 0.567%
p-value: p=<0.001
An AI-derived radiomics risk score from routine non-contrast chest CTs significantly improves cardiovascular risk prediction and statin eligibility classification beyond standard clinical calculators like PCE and PREVENT.
May improve risk stratification from routine CT when EHR data incomplete; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease relies on accurate risk assessment using scores such as the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) and PREVENT. However, necessary input variables for these scores are often unavailable in the electronic health record (EHR), and information from routinely collected data (e.g., non-contrast chest CT) may further improve performance. Here, we test whether a risk prediction model based on structural features of the heart and aorta from chest CT has added value to existing clinical algorithms for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods: We developed a LASSO model to predict fatal MACE over 12 years of follow-up using structural radiomics features describing cardiac chamber and aorta segmentations from 13,437 lung cancer screening chest CTs from the National Lung Screening Trial. We compared this radiomics model to the PCE and PREVENT scores in an external testing set of 4,303 individuals who had a chest CT at a Mass General Brigham site and had no history of diabetes, prior MACE, or statin treatment. Discrimination for incident MACE was assessed using the concordance index. We used a binary threshold to determine MACE rates in patients who were statin-eligible or ineligible by the PCE/PREVENT scores (≥7.5% risk) or the radiomics score (≥5.0% risk). Results were stratified by whether all variables were available to calculate the PCE or PREVENT scores. Results: In the external testing set (n = 4,303; mean age 61.5 ± 9.3 years; 47.1% male), 8.0% had incident MACE over a median 5.1 years of follow-up. The radiomics risk score significantly improved discrimination beyond the PCE (c-index 0.653 vs. 0.567, p < 0.001) and performed similarly in individuals who were missing inputs. Those statin-eligible by both the radiomics and PCE scores had a 2.6-fold higher incidence of MACE than those eligible by the PCE score alone (29.5 [20.5, 39.1] vs. 11.2 [8.0, 14.4] events per 1,000 person-years among PCE-eligible individuals). In patients missing inputs, incident MACE rates were 1.8-fold higher in those statin-eligible by the radiomics score than those statin-ineligible (29.5 [21.9, 37.6] vs. 16.7 [14.3, 19.0] events per 1000 person-years). Similar results were found when comparing to the PREVENT score. Left ventricular volume and short axis length were most predictive of myocardial infarction, while left atrial sphericity and surface-to-volume ratio were most predictive of stroke. Conclusions: Based on a single chest CT, a cardiac shape-based risk prediction model predicted cardiovascular events beyond clinical algorithms and demonstrated similar performance in patients who were missing inputs to standard cardiovascular risk calculators. Patients at high-risk by the radiomics score may benefit from intensified primary prevention (e.g., statin prescription).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oo et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (n=4,303). AI-derived radiomics risk score from non-contrast chest CT vs. Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) alone was evaluated on Discrimination for incident MACE (c-index) (p=<0.001). An AI-derived radiomics risk score based on non-contrast chest CT significantly improved discrimination for incident MACE when added to the Pooled Cohort Equations (c-index 0.653 vs. 0.567).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: