Key result
A fixed-dose combination of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin (10 mg/10 mg) achieved bioequivalence to the individual formulations taken concomitantly, with all primary pharmacokinetic parameter ratios falling within the predefined 0.80-1.25 equivalence range.
Why the study?
This study evaluated the bioequivalence of an ezetimibe/rosuvastatin fixed-dose combination compared to concomitant administration of individual formulations in Chinese healthy subjects under fasting conditions.
Does a fixed dose combination of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin (10 mg/10 mg) achieve bioequivalence compared to concomitant administration of individual formulations in healthy subjects?
RCT (n=67)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does a fixed dose combination of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin (10 mg/10 mg) achieve bioequivalence compared to concomitant administration of individual formulations in healthy subjects?
Effect estimate: Geometric mean ratio 0.98 (95% CI 0.91-1.06)
Absolute Event Rate: 117% vs 120%
The fixed-dose combination of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin (10 mg/10 mg) is bioequivalent to the individual formulations taken concomitantly in healthy Chinese subjects, supporting its use as a convenient single-pill alternative.
Bioequivalence in healthy volunteers warrants no practice change; leaves open patient outcome trials in hyperlipidemia.
INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the bioequivalence of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin fixed dose combination compared to the concomitant administration of individual formulations (ezetimibe and rosuvastatin) in Chinese healthy subjects under fasting conditions. METHODS: from test and individual reference formulations were evaluated to assess bioequivalence. The safety assessments included adverse events (AEs)/treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), potential clinically significant abnormalities (PCSAs) in vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (12-ECG), and clinical laboratory parameters. RESULTS: was similar in both treatments, with respective arithmetic values 12.4 ng/ml, 117 ng·h/mL, and 120 ng·h/mL for test formulation and 12.7 ng/ml, 120 ng·h/mL, and 123 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. Similarly, systemic exposure to unconjugated ezetimibe was 4.14 ng/ml, 89.7 ng·h/mL, and 102 ng·h/mL for the test formulation and 3.80 ng/ml, 89.7 ng·h/mL, and 102 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. Systemic exposure to total ezetimibe was 70.5 ng/ml, 664 ng·h/mL, and 718 ng·h/mL for test formulation and 60.2 ng/ml, 648 ng·h/mL, and 702 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. The point estimates for rosuvastatin unconjugated ezetimibe and total ezetimibe were in the acceptable range of 0.80-1.25. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed dose combination of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin (10 mg/10 mg) achieved bioequivalence with reference to commercial tablets. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTR20202108.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Di et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Healthy subjects (n=67). Ezetimibe/rosuvastatin fixed dose combination vs. Individual formulations of ezetimibe (10 mg) and rosuvastatin (10 mg) taken concomitantly was evaluated on Rosuvastatin AUC0-t (Geometric mean ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.91-1.06). A fixed-dose combination of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin (10 mg/10 mg) achieved bioequivalence to the individual formulations taken concomitantly, with all primary pharmacokinetic parameter ratios falling within the predefined 0.80-1.25 equivalence range.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: