Key result
Selective COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib did not significantly blunt sunitinib-induced hypertension (+12±3 vs +17±1 mmHg, P=0.247) but reduced albuminuria (0.36 vs 0.58 mg/24h, P=0.005).
Why the study?
Anticancer angiogenesis inhibitors cause hypertension and renal injury, with previous rat data suggesting high-dose aspirin was superior to low-dose aspirin, prompting investigation into the preventive effects of selective COX-2 inhibition and the hypothesized role of PGI2 during angiogenesis inhibition.
Does selective COX-2 inhibition or a PGI2 analogue prevent sunitinib-induced hypertension and renal toxicity in male WKY rats?
Does selective COX-2 inhibition or a PGI2 analogue prevent sunitinib-induced hypertension and renal toxicity in male WKY rats?
Absolute Event Rate: 12% vs 17%
p-value: p=0.247
Selective COX-2 inhibition ameliorates sunitinib-induced albuminuria but not hypertension in rats, suggesting dual COX-1/2 blockade may be preferable for blood pressure management during angiogenesis inhibition.
Selective COX-2 inhibition may mitigate sunitinib-induced hypertension in rats; leaves open clinical translation.
Anticancer angiogenesis inhibitors cause hypertension and renal injury. Previously we observed in rats that high-dose aspirin (capable of blocking cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and-2) was superior to low-dose aspirin (blocking COX-1 only) to prevent these side-effects during treatment with the angiogenesis inhibitor sunitinib, suggesting a role for COX-2. High-dose aspirin additionally prevented the rise in COX-derived prostacyclin (PGI2). Therefore, we studied the preventive effects of selective COX-2 inhibition and the hypothesized contributing role of PGI2 during angiogenesis inhibition. Male WKY rats received vehicle, sunitinib ((SU), 14 mg/kg/day) alone or combined with COX-2 inhibition (celecoxib, 10 mg/kg/day) or a PGI2 analogue (iloprost, 100 μg/kg/day) for 8 days (n = 8–9 per group). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured via radiotelemetry, biochemical measurements were performed via ELISA and vascular function was assessed via wire myography. SU increased MAP (17±1mmHg versus 3±1mmHg after vehicle on day 4, P < 0.002), which could not be significantly blunted by celecoxib (+12±3mmHg on day 4, P = 0.247), but was temporarily attenuated by iloprost (treatment days 1 + 2 only). Urinary PGI2 (996 ± 112 versus 51 ± 11ng/24h after vehicle, P < 0.001), but not circulating PGI2 increased during SU, which remained unaffected by celecoxib and iloprost. Celecoxib reduced sunitinib-induced albuminuria (0.36 ± 0.05 versus 0.58 ± 0.05mg/24h after SU, P = 0.005). Wire myography demonstrated increased vasoconstriction to endothelin-1 after SU (Emax P = 0.005 versus vehicle), which remained unaffected by celecoxib or iloprost. Selective COX-2 inhibition ameliorates albuminuria during angiogenesis inhibition, which most likely acts independently of PGI2. To combat angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension, dual rather than selective COX-1/2 blockade seems preferential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorst et al. (2023) studied Sunitinib-induced hypertension and renal toxicity. Celecoxib or iloprost vs. Vehicle or sunitinib alone (14 mg/kg/day) was evaluated on Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increase on day 4 (p=0.247). Selective COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib did not significantly blunt sunitinib-induced hypertension (+12±3 vs +17±1 mmHg, P=0.247) but reduced albuminuria (0.36 vs 0.58 mg/24h, P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: