Key result
Percutaneous PFO closure during live case demonstrations achieved 98% technical success, with similar major complication rates to routine cases but increased minor bleeding (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Live case demonstrations serve as an educational tool for interventional cardiology, but the safety and technical success of percutaneous PFO closure during live demonstrations required assessment.
Does percutaneous PFO closure during live case demonstrations have similar safety and technical success compared to routine cases?
Cohort (n=142)
No
Does percutaneous PFO closure during live case demonstrations have similar safety and technical success compared to routine cases?
Percutaneous PFO closure can be performed safely and successfully during live case demonstrations, with outcomes comparable to routine clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Live PFO closures in demonstrations show comparable success; observational data leaves open routine adoption pending prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Live case demonstrations serve as an educational tool for interventional techniques in cardiology. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and technical success of percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure during live case demonstrations. METHODS: All patients who had undergone percutaneous PFO closure with Amplatzer devices during live case demonstrations at our institution were consecutively included in this retrospective analysis. Procedure related events were compared with summary event rates derived from the eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating PFO closure, as well as with a propensity matched cohort of patients treated under usual conditions. RESULTS: From April 2004 to June 2015, 142 patients underwent percutaneous PFO closure during live demonstrations, mainly for secondary prevention of cryptogenic cerebrovascular events. The interventions were fluoroscopy guided and successful in all but three cases (2%). Minor adverse events occurred in nine patients (6%). Contrast TEE performed at about 6 months showed complete closure in 84%. No significant differences with regard to technical success and major complications rate were found compared to RCTs, except for an increased rate of minor bleeding observed during live case demonstrations (P for difference < 0.001), mainly attributable to concomitant arterial access for incidental coronary angiography performed in 70% of patients. Except for slightly longer procedure duration, no difference was found compared to a matched population treated under usual conditions. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous PFO closure can be performed during live case demonstrations with the same high technical success as during routine cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Praz et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Patent foramen ovale (cryptogenic cerebrovascular events) (n=142). Percutaneous PFO closure during live case demonstrations vs. PFO closure under usual conditions and RCT summary rates was evaluated on Technical success and safety (p=< 0.001). Percutaneous PFO closure during live case demonstrations achieved 98% technical success, with similar major complication rates to routine cases but increased minor bleeding (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: