Key result
Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (ce-TCD) demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 75.8% specificity for detecting residual right-to-left shunts after PFO closure compared to TEE.
Why the study?
Does contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (ce-TCD) accurately detect residual right-to-left shunts compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients after PFO percutaneous closure?
Observational (n=68)
Does contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (ce-TCD) accurately detect residual right-to-left shunts compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients after PFO percutaneous closure?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 75.8%
Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler is a highly sensitive tool with a 100% negative predictive value for ruling out significant residual shunts after PFO closure, potentially reducing the need for routine TEE.
ce-TCD may detect residual shunts post-PFO closure; leaves open whether it replaces TEE in routine follow-up.
Orzan F, Liboni W, Bonzano A, Molinari F, Ribezzo M, Rebaudengo N, Grippi G, Negri E. Follow-up of residual shunt after patent foramen ovale closure.Acta Neurol Scand: 2010: 122: 257–261.© 2009 The Authors Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Munksgaard. Objectives – Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is usually recommended in the evaluation of the patent foramen ovale (PFO). Our goal is to confirm the efficacy of contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (ce-TCD) in detecting residual significant right-to-left shunts (RLS) after PFO percutaneous closure. Materials and methods – Sixty-eight patients with a previous transient ischemic attack, stroke and a large PFO were investigated for residual RLS after percutaneous closure. Results – Assuming TEE as the gold standard, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of ce-TCD was 100%, whereas the specificity was 75.8% and the positive predictive value was 28%. Conclusions – ce-TCD appears to be the preferable technique to identify subjects with significant residual shunts after percutaneous closure of a PFO. In follow-up, if ce-TCD is negative, no further examination may be necessary; whereas if ce-TCD shows a residual shunt, it is advisable to perform a TEE investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orzan et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Patent foramen ovale (PFO) post percutaneous closure (n=68). Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (ce-TCD) vs. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Detection of residual significant right-to-left shunts (RLS) (Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 75.8%). Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (ce-TCD) demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 75.8% specificity for detecting residual right-to-left shunts after PFO closure compared to TEE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: