Key result
Losartan plus prednisolone fails to improve LVEF over placebo in post-COVID cardiac inflammation.
Why the study?
Persistent cardiac symptoms are common in post-COVID syndrome with evidence implicating cardiovascular inflammation, but no targeted treatment exists.
Does losartan plus prednisolone improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with post-COVID syndrome and CMR-defined cardiac inflammation?
RCT (n=279)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does losartan plus prednisolone improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with post-COVID syndrome and CMR-defined cardiac inflammation?
In patients with post-COVID syndrome and CMR-defined cardiac inflammation, 16 weeks of losartan and prednisolone did not significantly improve left ventricular ejection fraction compared to placebo.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The manuscript is well written, the introduction and aim are easy to follow, and the results are somewhat easy to follow. Notwithstanding, this reviewer is somewhat uneasy about the presentation of the changes in anatomical and functional measurements.”
“It is not surprising that treatment with Losartan reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure even in subjects with normal blood pressure. Thus, the reduction in blood pressure, in turn, reduces left ventricular afterload... However, there seems to be no reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index. Can the authors explain this result?”
“Overall, the manuscript is well structured, well written and data are well placed into a clinical context.”
Losartan plus prednisolone should not be used to target LVEF in post-COVID cardiac inflammation; challenges anti-inflammatory therapy and leaves alternative mechanisms open for testing.
Persistent cardiac symptoms are common in post-COVID syndrome, even without structural heart disease. Evidence implicates immune dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction and low-grade cardiovascular inflammation. Yet no targeted treatment exists. Myoflame-19 is a multicenter, double-blind clinical trial of 279 participants with inflammatory cardiac involvement defined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, randomized 1:1 to losartan plus prednisolone ( n = 139 ) or matching placebos ( n = 140 ) for 16 weeks. The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 124 and 122 participants. The primary endpoint, change in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, was neutral: between-group difference 0.74 percentage points (pp), 95%CI −0.14 to 1.62, p = 0.10, unpaired t-test; supportive baseline-adjusted ANCOVA 0.99, 95%CI 0.15-1.83, p = 0.021. Among prespecified secondary endpoints, several symptom and imaging measures showed numerical differences favoring intervention, including Average Symptom Score components (modified Canadian Chest Pain Scale −4.8 pp, 95%CI −17.3 to 7.6; NYHA class −8.1 pp, −20.6 to 4.3; Long COVID symptom burden −7.7 pp, −18.9 to 3.6), native T1 and T2 values (native T1 −2.46 ms, −8.35 to 3.42; native T2 −0.31 ms, −1.16 to 0.53), and LV end-diastolic volume ( + 1.45 ml/m², −0.09 to 3.00); however, confidence intervals included the null value and these findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating.Treatment was safe and well-tolerated. These findings indicate a neutral treatment effect on the primary endpoint. They inform targeted immunomodulation and design of future trials in post-COVID syndrome and inflammatory cardiac involvement. Trial registration: EudraCT 2022-001682-12; NCT05619653.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Püntmann et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Post-COVID syndrome and cardiac inflammation (n=279). Losartan plus prednisolone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (MD 0.74, 95% CI -0.14 to 1.62, p=0.10). Losartan plus prednisolone did not significantly improve left ventricular ejection fraction compared to placebo in patients with post-COVID syndrome and cardiac inflammation (MD 0.74 percentage points, p=0.10).
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: