Key result
Global infrastructure and multidisciplinary strategies are urgently needed to curb pandemic-exacerbated cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
CVD remains a leading contributor to global morbidity and mortality amid the COVID-19 pandemic, yet collective thinking and unified global approaches to address its burden are lacking.
Highlights the urgent need for a unified global infrastructure and culturally sensitive, multidisciplinary approaches to tackle the rising cardiovascular disease burden exacerbated by COVID-19.
Despite some indicators of a localized curtailing of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence, CVD remains one of the largest contributors to global morbidity and mortality. While the magnitude and impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have yet to be realized in its entirety, an unquestionable impact on global health and well-being is already clear. At a time when the global state of CVD is perilous, we provide a continental overview of prevalence data and initiatives that have positively influenced CVD outcomes. What is clear is that despite attempts to address the global burden of CVD, there remains a lack of collective thinking and approaches. Moving forward, a coordinated global infrastructure that, if developed with appropriate and relevant key stakeholders, could provide significant and longstanding benefits to public health and yield prominent and consistent policy resulting in impactful change. To achieve global impact, research priorities that address multi-disciplinary social, environmental, and clinical perspectives must be underpinned by unified approaches that maximize public health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faghy et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease prevention and management strategies was evaluated. Coordinated global infrastructure and multidisciplinary approaches are needed to address the perilous state of global cardiovascular disease exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: