Key result
This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, without reporting quantitative results.
Why the study?
Does transradial percutaneous coronary intervention improve safety and efficacy compared to transfemoral intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
Does transradial percutaneous coronary intervention improve safety and efficacy compared to transfemoral intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI, focusing on ischemic/bleeding events, reperfusion times, and radiation exposure.
Transradial PCI in STEMI raises procedural failure concerns; leaves open need for RCTs to guide practice.
Although transradial coronary intervention is widely applied for percutaneous procedures, its safety in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is controversial. The benefit of transradial approach in terms of reducing access site complications is well documented. However, higher rate of procedural failure and longer procedural times reported by some authors raise concerns regarding its applicability in STEMI. Our aim was to review the safety and efficacy of transradial coronary intervention versus transfemoral intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. This review focuses on key aspects of safety and efficacy: adverse ischemic and bleeding events, reperfusion times and radiation exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komócsi et al. (2010) conducted a review in Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Transradial coronary intervention vs. Transfemoral intervention was evaluated on Adverse ischemic and bleeding events, reperfusion times, and radiation exposure. This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, without reporting quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: