Key result
Cryo-electron microscopy reveals positive-strand RNA viruses organize vital replication factors into multimeric exit crowns.
Why the study?
Understanding and controlling positive-strand RNA virus genome replication within virus-induced membrane vesicles represents a major target.
Understanding the crown structure of positive-strand RNA virus replication complexes provides fundamental mechanistic insights that could guide new strategies for antiviral control and viral vector engineering.
Positive-strand RNA viruses, the largest genetic class of eukaryotic viruses, include coronaviruses and many other established and emerging pathogens. A major target for understanding and controlling these viruses is their genome replication, which occurs in virus-induced membrane vesicles that organize replication steps and protect double-stranded RNA intermediates from innate immune recognition. The structure of these complexes has been greatly illuminated by recent cryo-electron microscope tomography studies with several viruses. One key finding in diverse systems is the organization of crucial viral RNA replication factors in multimeric rings or crowns that among other functions serve as exit channels gating release of progeny genomes to the cytosol for translation and encapsidation. Emerging results suggest that these crowns serve additional important purposes in replication complex assembly, function, and interaction with downstream processes such as encapsidation. The findings provide insights into viral function and evolution and new bases for understanding, controlling, and engineering positive-strand RNA viruses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishikiori et al. (2022) conducted a review in Positive-strand RNA virus infection. Positive-strand RNA virus replication complex structures was evaluated. Cryo-electron microscope tomography reveals that positive-strand RNA viruses organize vital replication factors into multimeric crowns that serve as exit channels for progeny genomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: