Key result
A sudden reduction in exercising forearm perfusion pressure evoked compensatory vasodilation in 13 of 21 healthy young men, whereas 8 individuals lacked this response, impairing exercise tolerance.
Why the study?
Does a sudden reduction in exercising forearm perfusion pressure evoke compensatory vasodilation to defend oxygen delivery in healthy young men?
Does a sudden reduction in exercising forearm perfusion pressure evoke compensatory vasodilation to defend oxygen delivery in healthy young men?
A subset of healthy young individuals lacks compensatory vasodilation in response to reduced perfusion pressure during exercise, leading to impaired oxygen delivery and exercise tolerance.
Individual variability in oxygen delivery may limit exercise performance; leaves open relevance to clinical populations with impaired perfusion.
Compromising oxygen delivery (O 2 D) during exercise requires compensatory vasodilatory and/or pressor responses to protect O 2 D:demand matching. The purpose of the study was to determine whether compensatory vasodilation is absent in some healthy young individuals in the face of a sudden reduction in exercising forearm perfusion pressure and whether this affects the exercise pressor response. Twenty-one healthy young men (21.6 ± 2.0 yr) completed rhythmic forearm exercise at a work rate equivalent to 70% of their own maximal exercise vasodilation. During steady-state exercise, the exercising arm was rapidly adjusted from below to above heart level, resulting in a reduction in forearm perfusion pressure of −30.7 ± 0.9 mmHg. Forearm blood flow (ml/min; brachial artery Doppler and echo ultrasound), mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg; finger photoplethysmography), and exercising forearm venous effluent (antecubital vein catheter) measurements revealed distinct compensatory vasodilatory differences. Thirteen individuals responded with compensatory vasodilation (509 ± 128 vs. 632 ± 136 ml·min −1 ·100 mmHg −1 ; P < 0.001), while eight individuals did not (663 ± 165 vs. 667 ± 167 ml·min −1 ·100 mmHg −1 ; P = 0.6). Compensatory pressor responses between groups were not different (5.5 ± 5.5 and 9.7 ± 9.5 mmHg; P = 0.2). Forearm blood flow, O 2 D, and oxygen consumption were all protected in compensators (all P > 0.05) but not in noncompensators, who therefore suffered compromises to exercise performance (6 ± 14 vs. −36 ± 29 N; P = 0.004). Phenotypic differences were not explained by potassium or nitric oxide bioavailability. In conclusion, both compensator and noncompensator vasodilator phenotype responses to a sudden compromise to exercising muscle blood flow are evident. Interindividual differences in the mechanisms governing O 2 D:demand matching should be considered as factors influencing exercise tolerance. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In healthy young individuals, compromising submaximally exercising muscle perfusion appears to evoke compensatory vasodilation to defend oxygen delivery. Here we report the absence of compensatory vasodilation in 8 of 21 such individuals, despite their vasodilatory capacity and increases in perfusion with increasing exercise intensity being indistinguishable from compensators. The absence of compensation impaired exercise tolerance. These findings suggest that interindividual differences in oxygen delivery:demand matching efficacy affect exercise tolerance and depend on the nature of a delivery:demand matching challenge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bentley et al. (2017) studied Healthy (n=21). Sudden reduction in exercising forearm perfusion pressure vs. Steady-state exercise (arm below heart level) was evaluated on Compensatory vasodilation (forearm vascular conductance). A sudden reduction in exercising forearm perfusion pressure evoked compensatory vasodilation in 13 of 21 healthy young men, whereas 8 individuals lacked this response, impairing exercise tolerance.