Key result
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using a cerebral protection device achieved 100% procedural success with no embolic events or major bleeding over a mean follow-up of 426 days.
Why the study?
Left atrial appendage thrombosis increases stroke risk and its management needs to be assessed.
Does percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using a cerebral protection device improve safety and efficacy in patients with atrial fibrillation complicated by LAA thrombosis?
Cohort (n=14)
No
Does percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using a cerebral protection device improve safety and efficacy in patients with atrial fibrillation complicated by LAA thrombosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Left atrial appendage closure with the systematic use of a cerebral protection device is a feasible and safe therapeutic option for patients with atrial fibrillation and LAA thrombosis.
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombosis increases the risk of stroke and its management has to be assessed. The aim of the present study is to evaluate short and long-term safety and efficacy of a standardized approach of percutaneous LAA closure (LAAC) routinely using a cerebral protection device (CPD) in patients with LAA thrombosis or sludge (LAAT). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 14 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation complicated by LAAT presenting in a high-volume tertiary center. In seven patients (50%) LAAT was found after anticoagulant withdrawal for severe bleedings and in the remaining half LAAT was found despite appropriate anticoagulant therapy. All patients were treated with a standardized interventional approach of LAAC routinely using a CPD and guided by transoesophageal echocardiography. Six patients (42.8%) presented organized thrombi while eight LAA sludge (57.1%). In 13 patients (92.8%) CPD was positioned through a right radial arterial access. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. In one patient we assisted to embolization of the thrombus during deployment of the device in the absence of neurological consequences. During a mean follow up of 426 ± 307 days, one patient died for non-cardiac cause while no embolic event or major bleeding were reported. CONCLUSION: In an unselected cohort, LAAC with the systematic use of CPD was a feasible, safe and effective therapeutic option for LAAT both acutely and after long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Limite et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation complicated by LAA thrombosis or sludge (n=14). Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using a cerebral protection device (CPD) was evaluated on Procedural success, embolic events, major bleeding, and death. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using a cerebral protection device achieved 100% procedural success with no embolic events or major bleeding over a mean follow-up of 426 days.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: