Key result
Larger archwire dimensions resulted in less lingual tipping of the central incisor but required longer treatment duration for space closure in a finite element model.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the long-term effect of different archwire dimensions combined with different extraction space widths on the biomechanical behaviour of tooth movement during space closure using sliding mechanics.
Does archwire dimension and extraction space width affect tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics?
Does archwire dimension and extraction space width affect tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics?
Larger archwire dimensions provide better controlled tooth movement during space closure but require longer treatment duration.
May guide archwire selection in extraction cases; hypothesis-generating and requires clinical validation.
Purpose The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term effect of different archwire dimensions in combination with different extraction space widths on the biomechanical behaviour of tooth movement during space closure using sliding mechanics.Materials and Methods A finite element model of the maxillary dentition was constructed with 0.022 × 0.028-in brackets and three different archwires of 0.017 × 0.025-in, 0.018 × 0.025-in, and 0.019 × 0.025-in. The extraction space was set as 4 or 7 mm. En-masse retraction was performed by applying a retraction force from 4 mm power arm. We compared the degree of labio-lingual tipping of the central incisor, mesio-distal tipping of the canine, mesio-distal and bucco-lingual tipping of the first molar, rotation of the occlusal plane and the velocity of space closure when varying the archwire dimesions in combination with different extraction space widths.Results The central incisor showed lingual crown tipping for all three archwire dimensions even with 4 mm power arm. The larger the archwire dimension, the less substantially the incisor tipped lingually. The first molar showed lingual tipping with small size archwires. The wider the residual extraction space, the more substantially the central incisor tipped lingually.Conclusions The larger the archwire dimension, namely, the better controlled tooth movement we try to achieve, the longer the treatment duration is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayegh et al. (2025) studied Orthodontic space closure. Different archwire dimensions (0.017 × 0.025-in, 0.018 × 0.025-in, 0.019 × 0.025-in) and extraction space widths (4 or 7 mm) vs. Compared against each other was evaluated on Biomechanical behaviour of tooth movement (degree of tipping, rotation, and velocity of space closure). Larger archwire dimensions resulted in less lingual tipping of the central incisor but required longer treatment duration for space closure in a finite element model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: