Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Socioeconomic inequality in air pollution exposure poses a significant public health challenge, yet little is known about how such disparities vary across levels of urbanization. This study aims to examine the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and PM 2.5 exposure in Taiwan from an urban-rural perspective. Methods This ecological study used township-level data from 2011 to 2020. PM 2.5 exposure estimates were generated using land-use regression and Ordinary Kriging models. Socioeconomic position was assessed using multiple SES indicators, including educational attainment. Inequality was quantified using the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and the Relative Index of Inequality (RII). Results PM 2.5 concentrations were highest in metropolitan core areas and lowest in remote townships. Townships with higher SES experienced greater PM 2.5 exposure. SII and RII for the proportion of individuals with higher education showed a consistent increase over the study period, indicating worsening socioeconomic inequality. However, inequality patterns differed between urban and rural areas. Conclusions Substantial urban-rural disparities in PM 2.5 exposure and socioeconomic inequality were observed. The worsening trends highlight the need for immediate policy interventions to protect vulnerable populations and further research to identify and address pollution sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: