Key result
Elevated LDL-C linked to ~3.6 million global cardiovascular deaths in 2023.
Observational
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Elevated bad cholesterol in itself is not a killer but it is surely the most important risk-factor besides other risk-factors. It is a marker for cardiovascular disease and stroke and is commonly found among Indians. These numbers are not unexpected. However, effective medicines, including injectables, are available to lower it.”
Despite declining age-standardized rates, the absolute global health burden of elevated LDL-C has increased since 1990 due to population growth and aging, highlighting the need for improved prevention and treatment strategies.
Importance Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of premature death worldwide. Assessing the LDL-C–related burden is critical for guiding prevention and treatment strategies. Objectives To estimate the global, regional, and national burden of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke attributable to elevated LDL-C (relative to 35-54 mg/dL) from 1990 to 2023 and to quantify the contributions of population growth, aging, risk-deleted burden, and exposure changes to burden trends. Design, Setting, and Population This comparative risk assessment, part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023, estimated population-level LDL-C exposure and associated health loss in 204 countries and territories. Mean LDL-C levels were estimated using spatiotemporal gaussian process regression based on 806 studies across 161 countries. Relative risks were derived from meta-analyses of 38 randomized clinical trials. Population-attributable fractions for deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were estimated by age and sex for adults aged 25 years or older from 1990 to 2023, with 95% uncertainty intervals. Exposure Population-level LDL-C concentrations. Main Outcomes and Measures Population-attributable fractions, counts, and rates (all ages and age standardized per 100 000) of LDL-C–attributable deaths and DALYs from ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke, with uncertainty intervals. Results In 2023, elevated LDL-C accounted for 3.6 million deaths (95% uncertainty interval, 2.2-5.4 million; 6.0% of global mortality) and 90.7 million DALYs (95% uncertainty interval, 58.9-123.3 million; 3.2% of DALYs). Although global all-ages rates remained stable, age-standardized death and DALY rates decreased by 45.6% and 39.5%, respectively, since 1990. In 2023, age-standardized LDL-C–attributable DALY rates were highest in Eastern Europe and lowest in high-income Asia-Pacific. One-third of the global LDL-C burden occurred in India and China. Population growth and aging drove the increasing burden, with notable regional disparities in LDL-C exposure and risk-deleted DALY rates shifting toward middle-sociodemographic settings. Conclusions and Relevance Despite declining age-standardized rates, the absolute LDL-C burden has increased since 1990 due to demographic changes and has shifted toward middle-sociodemographic countries. Measurement and surveillance gaps persist. Strengthened prevention, diagnosis, and treatment access strategies are essential to mitigate the health burden of LDL-C.
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collaborators et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke. Elevated LDL-C vs. 35-54 mg/dL was evaluated on Population-attributable fractions, counts, and rates of LDL-C-attributable deaths and DALYs from ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke. In 2023, elevated LDL-C accounted for 3.6 million deaths (95% UI 2.2-5.4 million) and 90.7 million DALYs, with absolute burden increasing since 1990 despite declining age-standardized rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: