Randomized trial evaluates a test for comparing parameter equality across multiple populations, suggesting effective inference methods.
The comparison of a parameter in k populations is a classical problem in statistics. Testing for the equality of means or variances are typical examples. Most procedures designed to deal with this problem assume that k is fixed and that samples with increasing sample sizes are available from each population. This paper introduces and studies a test for the comparison of an estimable parameter across k populations, when k is large and the sample sizes from each population are small when compared with k . The proposed test statistic is asymptotically distribution-free under the null hypothesis of parameter homogeneity, enabling asymptotically exact inference without parametric assumptions. Additionally, the behavior of the proposal is studied under alternatives. Simulations are conducted to evaluate its finite-sample performance, and a linear bootstrap method is implemented to improve its behavior for small k . Finally, an application to a real dataset is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero-Madroñal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: