Randomized trial reports no micro- or macro-plastics in three shark species, suggesting low exposure in the region.
Plastic pollution is increasingly documented across marine environments, yet exposure data remain absent for most shark species. We examined the gastrointestinal contents of 44 juvenile sharks representing three species: gummy shark ( Mustelus antarcticus ), southern saw shark ( Pristiophorus nudipinnis ), and elephant (or ghost) shark ( Callorhinchus milii ) collected as bycatch from demersal trawl and longline fishing in the Bass Strait off north-eastern Tasmania in September 2018. Gastrointestinal tracts were excised intact and contents rinsed through stacked sieves and examined for micro- and macro-plastics (>1 mm). No plastics were detected in any of the 44 individuals examined. While these null results may reflect genuinely low exposure in this region, we emphasise that reporting such findings is essential for establishing baseline conditions against which future change can be measured. Given the commercial and ecological importance of these species in southern Australian waters, repeat sampling over time is strongly encouraged to detect any emerging trends in plastics exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nadesh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: