Systematic review identifies theoretical framework linking circular economy and clean energy in SMEs, suggesting future research directions.
Purpose The intersection of circular economy (CE) principles and clean energy adoption represents a critical yet underexplored frontier in sustainable industrial transformation. Despite manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) accounting for a disproportionate share of global industrial energy consumption, no prior systematic review has jointly examined this nexus at the SME level, leaving policymakers and practitioners without a consolidated, methodologically transparent evidence base. Design/methodology/approach A PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic literature review was conducted on 68 peer-reviewed records retrieved from the Scopus database (2015–2026). Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) with a four-cluster solution (K = 4), selected through a coherence-based robustness check, was deployed to identify latent thematic structures, complemented by Pearson correlation analysis to examine inter-cluster relationships and bibliometric associations. Findings LDA identified four thematic clusters: Drivers and Barriers (40.1%), Policy Instruments (26.0%), Sustainability Performance (19.6%), and Life-Cycle Assessment and Materials Circularity (14.3%). Negative inter-cluster correlations (r = −0.465 to −0.304, p < 0.001–0.012) indicate limited within-document co-occurrence among these four clusters, consistent with distinguishable thematic emphases within the corpus. The literature is structurally imbalanced, privileging antecedent condition diagnosis over outcome measurement and lifecycle rigour. Originality/Value Drawing on Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, Institutional Theory, and as a proposed theoretical gap Frugal Innovation Theory, this review synthesises an integrative multi-level theoretical framework linking macro-institutional pressures through firm-level capabilities to CE–clean energy performance outcomes, moderated by firm size, sector, institutional quality, and digital readiness. Five empirically testable propositions and a structured future research agenda are developed, prioritising longitudinal designs, configurational methods, and evidence from underrepresented Global South manufacturing contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: