Examines multi-stage Alzheimer’s disease discrimination in subjects using machine learning, suggesting improved diagnostic accuracy through stratification.
Accurate and early characterization of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in biologically heterogeneous stages such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We propose an sMRI-based machine learning framework for multi-stage AD discrimination, encompassing six clinical groups (cognitively normal (CN, n = 103 ), subjective memory complaints (SMC, n = 54 ), early MCI (EMCI, n = 151 ), MCI ( n = 229 ), late MCI (LMCI, n = 117 ), and AD ( n = 114 )), with explicit β -amyloid (A β ) stratification of MCI subtypes ( + / − ). T1-weighted sMRI scans from 768 ADNI subjects were analyzed using histogram and GLCM texture features across multiple anatomical planes and multi-scale wavelet decompositions. The framework demonstrated robust performance across 36 pairwise comparisons under stratified 5-fold cross-validation with SMOTE and RUS, achieving AUC > 0.95 in well-separated tasks (e.g., AD vs EMCI − ) and in SMC vs AD and SMC vs MCI + . More challenging “gray-zone” distinctions (e.g., EMCI − vs EMCI + ) showed moderate performance ( AUC ≈ 0.62–0.67), with RUS providing the most overall balanced results. Feature analysis revealed dominant contributions from GLCM descriptors, complemented by histogram features, with highest discriminability in Level-2 wavelet sub-bands (HL2 and LH2). A β stratification enabled a more biologically grounded interpretation of disease progression, improving discrimination in later stages while remaining challenging in early-stage comparisons. Overall, sMRI radiomics provides an interpretable framework for capturing stage-specific structural patterns in AD, highlighting the importance of biological stratification and robust validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menezes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: