Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental investigation demonstrates differing stiffness and capacity of steel connections under uplift loading, suggesting design considerations.
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the rotational stiffness and capacity of three types of cold-formed steel portal frame apex connections under uplift loading: Type A connections with web bolts only, Type B connections with additional top flange bolts, and Type C connections with a haunch. The connections were tested in four-point bending. Failure consistently took place in the rafter by cross-sectional instability at the bolt pair connecting the rafter channels back-to-back nearest the connection. However, the capacity of the Type A connections was on average 11% lower than that of the other types, due to the presence of a shear lag effect. Adding bolts to the top flange (Type B) slightly increased the initial stiffness of the connection (by 12%), as well as the final stiffness during the bolt bearing phase (by 40%), but the most significant improvement in moment-rotation behaviour originated from a reduction in the length of the slip plateau. Type C connections displayed the highest initial stiffness and showed no low-stiffness slip phase. When compared to nominally identical specimens under gravity loading, no significant differences in behaviour were detected for the Type A and B connections. The Type C connections, on the other hand, were stiffer under uplift loading, with a 37% higher initial stiffness and a 21% higher final stiffness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: