Quasi-randomized trial examines verbal functions and attention post acute exercise in adults, suggesting a positive impact of intensity.
Language is a cognitive domain essential for communication; however, its responsiveness to acute physical exercise or activity is unexplored. This quasi-randomized trial examined the effects of different intervention modalities on verbal functions and attention. Ninety-eight participants were assigned to high-intensity interval training (HIIT), coordinatively demanding motor activity (COOR), or a sedentary control group (CG). A pre–post design with a 24-hour follow-up assessed semantic (VFsem) and category-switching verbal fluency (VFsw), verbal learning, and attention. No group × time effects were observed for verbal learning encoding ( p = .258); however, HIIT showed a steeper learning slope compared to CG ( p = .044). Following an interference list, proactive interference was unaffected ( p = .428), whereas retroactive interference differed significantly between groups ( p = .019), with CG showing lower susceptibility than both intervention groups. No group differences were found for consolidation after 20 min or 24 h ( p ’s ≥ .271). Semantic verbal fluency improved significantly following HIIT relative to CG ( p = .029), with no significant effects in VFsw ( p = .221) or attention ( p = .187). We conclude an intensity-dependent pattern following the interventions, manifesting as enhanced semantic lexical retrieval and an exploratory finding of a steeper encoding following HIIT, compared to CG, with COOR in between, accompanied by an increased susceptibility to retroactive interference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fischer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: