Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes congestion in railway marshalling yard operations, suggesting interventions for risk management.
Railway marshalling yard inbound operations are affected by irregular train arrivals, finite receiving-yard capacity, service interruptions, and boundary states carried across operating days. This study develops a hybrid fluid–queueing and simulation framework for analyzing congestion evolution in the arrival–technical-operation–hump-disassembly process. The framework integrates continuous arrival-input construction, boundary-state stability validation (PSSBV), and daily gated integer discrete-event simulation (DGDES). Circular kernel density estimation and observed train-level sequences represent non-stationary arrivals; PSSBV determines operationally reasonable initial conditions; and DGDES captures finite-capacity admission, FIFO outside holding, parallel technical operations, hump disassembly, and service-interruption windows. The framework is evaluated under deterministic and stochastic service-time conditions using continuous-operation data from a large Chinese marshalling yard and field-observed occupancy and waiting-time indicators. The results show that congestion is driven less by daily arrival volume alone than by the interaction of concentrated arrivals, pre-disassembly backlog, residual in-yard occupancy, and insufficient hump-disassembly clearance capacity. The simulated outside holding rate follows fluctuations in the field-based track–time load ratio and is closely associated with disassembly waiting time, system sojourn time, and pre-disassembly queue length. Lagged analysis indicates that previous-day saturation and residual workload can increase next-day outside holding risk. Stochastic service times produce similar high-risk patterns while increasing variability and tail-risk exposure. The proposed threshold–probability diagnostic framework supports rapid congestion-risk identification and dispatching-oriented control under continuous and uncertain operating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: