Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reports the differential expression of MpPPO1 and MpPPO2 in banana fruits, indicating key roles in development.
Ecuador ranks among the world’s leading banana exporters; however, postharvest enzymatic browning, driven by polyphenol oxidases (PPOs), remains an important determinant of fruit quality loss and reduced market value. The genes encoding PPOs in Musa paradisiaca L., a triploid hybrid (AAB) widely cultivated in Ecuador, have not previously been described at the genomic or transcriptional level. The objective of this study was to generate a preliminary de novo draft assembly of Ecuadorian M. paradisiaca, identify PPO-coding loci recovered in this assembly, and compare their relative expression across three field-defined green-fruit developmental stages: early, intermediate, and physiologically mature-green. High-molecular-weight genomic DNA sequencing was performed using the Oxford Nanopore MinION Mk1B platform, and 13,239 contigs were obtained by de novo assembly with Flye v2.9.6. Two intronless PPO-coding loci, designated MpPPO1 and MpPPO2, were identified and deposited in GenBank under accessions PX565008 and PX565009. qRT-PCR showed significantly higher MpPPO1 expression at the physiologically mature-green stage, whereas MpPPO2 showed only a non-significant trend toward higher expression at the intermediate stage. These profiles indicate transcriptional divergence and identify MpPPO1 as a candidate associated with late green-fruit development or physiological maturity. However, because stage classification relied on a qualitative field harvest index and neither controlled postharvest ripening nor quantitative maturity, PPO activity, or browning measurements were performed, the results do not demonstrate ripening-induced activation, functional subfunctionalization, or causality in browning. These findings provide a preliminary molecular basis for future functional and postharvest studies in commercial banana cultivars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huebla-Concha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: