PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Correctness Under Time: Bi-Temporal, Supersession-Aware Memory for AI Agents

View Full Paper
MSMayank Sahu

Key Points

  • The aim is to address fact retention and retrieval accuracy in AI agents by introducing a bi-temporal memory system.
  • Developed a tiered memory system called Continuum that incorporates valid-time and transaction-time for facts.
  • Compared Continuum's performance to traditional memory systems using scripted knowledge-update and point-in-time benchmarks.
  • Evaluated accuracy using pre-defined benchmarks and controlled decompositions.
  • Continuum achieved 100% accuracy on scripted knowledge-update benchmarks, outperforming traditional systems significantly.
  • Competitor systems scored 72% for the latest values but struggled with point-in-time retrieval, indicating a structural gap in memory design.
  • Overall accuracy on LongMemEval-S for Continuum was ~74%, limited by reasoning capabilities rather than retrieval methods.

Abstract

LLM agents do not persist: they forget across sessions, and within a growing memory they surface stale facts as if current. We present Continuum, a tiered memory system whose long-term store is bi-temporal — every fact carries a valid-time (when it held in the world) and a transaction-time (when the system learned it) — with soft supersession that retires a contradicted fact in place, keeping retrieval current while history stays intact and auditable. On scripted knowledge-update and point-in-time ("as-of") benchmarks, Continuum answers 100% correctly, versus 38% for an append-only store and 20%/75% for single-axis baselines. Run on the same scenarios, the real Mem0 SDK — which resolves contradictions by deleting the superseded fact and has no valid-time axis — is competitive at returning the latest value (72%) but scores 27% on point-in-time queries and 30% on the bi-temporal set overall. The gap is structural: deleting a fact destroys the history an as-of query needs. On LongMemEval-S Continuum reaches ~74% judged accuracy; a controlled decomposition finds the ceiling is answerer reasoning, not retrieval. Continuum is open-source, hybrid (bge-m3 + BM25 fused with RRF over an HNSW-indexed pgvector store), and MCP-exposed; we release the code and benchmark sets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mayank Sahu (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6c472e747664a1aa73c3a6https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21691913
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper