Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes aerodynamic recovery and structural limits in cylindrical thermocouples, suggesting a framework for probe selection.
The selection of a temperature probe for aerodynamic applications involves a critical trade-off between the measurement accuracy and structural robustness. While the existing literature typically treats thermal performance and structural limits as isolated problems, this study bridges this gap by introducing a novel coupled experimental framework in which the aerodynamic and structural performance of the probes are characterized and interpreted jointly. Three unshielded, cylindrical K-type thermocouples (diameters: D = 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm) were tested in a freejet facility across a Mach number range of M = 0.05 to 0.50, corresponding to a probe Reynolds number range of ReD≈ 500 to 16,200, at a free cantilever length of L = 70 mm for aerodynamic characterization and L = 20–70 mm for structural characterization. Tests were conducted at a total temperature of approximately To ≈ 291 − 294 K, continuously monitored throughout each run. The recovery factor was highest for the 0.5 mm probe (r ≈ 0.4–0.55) and comparable for the 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm probes (r ≈ 0.29–0.34), such that the largest diameter did not produce the lowest value. Structurally, the 0.5 mm probe reached its deflection limit at M ≈ 0.22, while the 1.0 mm probe remained stable to M ≈ 0.36, for a free length of 70 mm. By treating probe selection as a constrained selection problem rather than an ad hoc decision, this study provides a quantitative operational envelope—a critical, data-driven framework for researchers to balance sensor accuracy and physical viability in aerodynamic testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erdem Özyurt (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: