Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Predatory journals are criticized widely for weak peer-review and profit-driven editorial practices, but little empirical evidence assesses their capacity to publish low-quality or AI-generated research. This study examines the level to which these journals publish undergraduate essays and AI-generated manuscripts. We submitted papers to 144 predatory journals identified through spam solicitations, Beall’s list ( https://beallslist.net ), and the Predatory Journals database ( www.predatoryjournals.org/news/predatory-journals-list-2025 ). This included 19 undergraduate political science and human rights essays and 10 AI-generated engineering case reports to test the degree to which these essays are published. We find that most undergraduate essays and AI-generated manuscripts are accepted, which confirms the low quality of these outlets and the risk emanating from them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stockemer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: