Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicenter study evaluates bimekizumab's effectiveness in psoriasis, indicating faster responses in biologic-naïve patients.
OBJECTIVES: Bimekizumab, a dual interleukin (IL)-17A/IL-17F inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in clinical trials. However, real-world evidence comparing outcomes according to previous biologic exposure remains limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of bimekizumab in biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients with plaque psoriasis, including high-impact body areas. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 98 patients treated with bimekizumab (23 biologic-naïve, 75 biologic-experienced). Outcomes included Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), PASI90 and PASI100 response rates, and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores for scalp, nail, genital, palmoplantar, and pretibial psoriasis. Biologic-experienced patients were further stratified by the number of prior biologics. Similar findings were observed in high-impact areas. Differences persisted through week 16 but disappeared from week 24 onward. Nevertheless, biologic-naïve patients maintained numerically higher response rates throughout follow-up. Previous biologic burden did not compromise long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Bimekizumab showed sustained effectiveness regardless of prior biologic exposure. Nevertheless, biologic-naïve patients achieved faster and deeper responses, supporting earlier use of bimekizumab to maximize treatment benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trovato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: