Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates a SNP panel for hybrid classification in European lobster, highlighting its limitations in later generations.
Accurate detection of hybridization and introgression is critical not only for basic research, but also for fisheries management. In many species, however, hybrid ancestry is difficult to detect beyond the F1 generation, especially when based on limited genetic markers. In European waters, hybridization between the native Homarus gammarus and the introduced H. americanus poses a direct risk to the integrity of native stocks and effective fishery management, yet detection methods are often limited to morphological traits or first-generation hybrids. A set of 79 SNPs originally developed for population genetic analyzes in H. gammarus and subsequently applied to distinguish H. gammarus, H. americanus, and F1 individuals has shown promise, but its capacity to resolve later-generation backcrosses remains untested. Here, we evaluated this panel's performance under the allele-frequency distributions and marker properties observed in the empirical dataset it was based on, using individual-based resampling to generate genotypes with known ancestry proportions. We show that the panel retains discriminatory power for broad ancestry classes and early-generation hybrids, but with reduced accuracy for later-generation backcrosses and especially high uncertainty in distinguishing backcrosses towards H. gammarus from variation within the H. gammarus parental reference. These findings provide an assessment of hybrid classification performance for this specific panel and demonstrate the value of empirical resampling simulations for identifying both the utility and the limitations of existing marker panels in fisheries-relevant species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Røed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: