Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical exploration of human agency in relation to superintelligent AI, indicating potential societal implications.
Advanced-AI debates usually ask whether machines will remain aligned with human values. This paper examines the reciprocal question: whether humans would retain the capacities required for meaningful agency if artificial systems became persistently more competent, reliable and pervasive than human decision-makers. It develops the end of necessary adulthood hypothesis as a conditional theory, not a forecast. Functional adulthood is defined through consequential authorship, judgment under uncertainty, care, answerability, self-regulation and collective agency. The framework identifies a five-part mechanism—competence concentration, rational deference, responsibility displacement, intergenerational attenuation and institutional lock-in—and distinguishes three rival trajectories: infantilization, liberation and bifurcation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niclas Braun (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: