Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates effects of resisted and assisted swimming activation on performance in collegiate swimmers, suggesting differing benefits.
Previous research has shown that resisted and assisted sprint training can acutely enhance sprint performance via post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE). However, whether PAPE induced by conditioning activities that closely resemble sport-specific movements occurs in aquatic environments remains unclear. This study investigated the acute effects of resisted and assisted swimming activation on 50-m freestyle performance. Thirteen male collegiate swimmers completed a randomized, counterbalanced, repeated-measures design involving three warm-up conditions: standard warm-up (SWU), resisted swimming activation (RSA; 10-m maximal sprint with 8% body-mass load), and assisted swimming activation (ASA; 40-m maximal sprint at 103% maximal velocity). Compared with the other warm-up protocols, RSA significantly reduced split times over 5–10 m (p = 0.017, ES = 0.061) and 15–20 m (p < 0.001, ES = 0.188), and was associated with greater stroke length at 15 m (p = 0.001, ES = 0.188) and higher swimming velocity (p = 0.026, ES = 0.148). In contrast, ASA significantly reduced split time over 30–35 m (p = 0.003, ES = 0.191), but resulted in lower stroke length (p < 0.010, ES = 0.151) and swimming velocity (p < 0.001, ES = 0.199) at 25 m compared with the other warm-up conditions. RSA appears to preferentially enhance early race performance, whereas ASA may facilitate mid-race speed maintenance with limited overall benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: