Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced diagnosis speed and accuracy in children with cancer, suggesting clinical utility of rapid WGS.
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has been shown to improve diagnosis beyond standard-of-care genetic tests and guide precision treatment for childhood cancer. While WGS is now offered for children with suspected cancer in England, clinical workflows typically return results after several weeks whereas clinical decisions are often required within days. We evaluated feasibility and efficacy of a rapid WGS (rWGS) research workflow with streamlined bioinformatics to deliver clinical genomic findings (NCT07201038, Active, not recruiting). In 54 children with suspected or confirmed malignancy, rWGS reduced mean end-to-end turnaround time from 42 to 3 days. rWGS detected 147 of 155 (95%) clinically actionable variants identified in the cohort, whereas standard of care testing detected 138 of 155 (89%) variants. In a subset of 35 patients assessed prospectively, clinicians reported that in 17 (49%), rWGS either (i) facilitated faster access to targeted therapy and risk stratification, or (ii) avoided unnecessary investigations and treatment escalation. These findings indicate feasibility and suggest clinical utility of rWGS when deployed as a first line diagnostic test in pediatric oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David H. Rowitch (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: