Reports a counterexample to binary rank multiplicativity in zero-one matrices, highlighting implications for matrix theory.
The binary rank of a zero-one matrix is the minimum number of pairwise disjoint all-one rectangles that partition its one-support. We give a proof-producing order-five counterexample to multiplicativity under Kronecker products. For an explicit 5-by-5 matrix A, brank(A) = 5 and brank(A ⊗ A) = brank(A ⊗ Aᵀ) = 24 < 25. Both upper bounds are given by explicit 24-rectangle partitions. Both lower bounds are certified by separately regenerated and independently clause-audited exact-23 SAT encodings together with complete checked DRAT refutations. We also derive exact padded families, an exact symmetric self-square with brank(S) = 10 and brank(S ⊗ S) = 96, integral multicover identities, finite higher-power bounds, and fractional asymptotic bounds. The result was obtained independently. During manuscript preparation, we learned that Yaroslav Shitov had publicly posted a different counterexample first. We make no claim to first public resolution. The present work emphasizes exact product ranks, infinite families, a same-factor and symmetric counterexample, and complete reproducible proof closure. This deposit contains the manuscript and LaTeX source, literal partition certificates, exact-23 CNF formulas, complete DRAT refutations, independent Python and JavaScript verifiers, mutation tests, exact arithmetic checks, and a strict manifest. From the extracted archive, running python verify.py replays every theorem-bearing computational claim. Research and proof-development assistance was provided by GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra. Licensing is component-specific: the manuscript, documentation, certificates, and data are CC BY 4.0; project-authored source code is MIT licensed; bundled third-party code retains its upstream license. See LICENSES.md in the archive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poindexter, Donald D., Jr (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: