Key result
The socioeconomic gap in exercise capacity (VO2peak) between patients with basic versus high education widened following cardiac rehabilitation (P for interaction <0.001).
Why the study?
Socioeconomic status strongly predicts cardiovascular health, but the immediate and long-term effects of cardiac rehabilitation across socioeconomic strata in elderly European cardiac patients were unclear.
Does the effect of cardiac rehabilitation on exercise capacity and risk factors differ across socioeconomic strata in elderly cardiac patients?
Observational (n=1,626)
Yes
Does the effect of cardiac rehabilitation on exercise capacity and risk factors differ across socioeconomic strata in elderly cardiac patients?
Cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients may inadvertently widen the socioeconomic gap in exercise capacity, highlighting the need for individualized adaptation of CR programs.
CR may widen socioeconomic disparities in exercise capacity after rehabilitation in elderly patients; leaves open whether tailored programs can mitigate this.
AIMS: Socioeconomic status is a strong predictor of cardiovascular health. The aim of this study was to describe the immediate and long-term effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) across socioeconomic strata in elderly cardiac patients in Europe. METHODS AND RESULTS: The observational EU-CaRE study is a prospective study with eight CR sites in seven European countries. Patients ≥65 years with coronary heart disease or heart valve surgery participating in CR were consecutively included. Data were obtained at baseline, end of CR and at one-year follow up. Educational level as a marker for socioeconomic status was divided into basic, intermediate and high. The primary endpoint was exercise capacity (peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak)). Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular risk factors, medical treatment and scores for depression, anxiety and quality of life (QoL). A total of 1626 patients were included; 28% had basic, 48% intermediate and 24% high education. A total of 1515 and 1448 patients were available for follow-up analyses at end of CR and one-year, respectively. Patients with basic education were older and more often female. At baseline we found a socioeconomic gradient in VO2peak, lifestyle-related cardiovascular risk factors, anxiety, depression and QoL. The socioeconomic gap in VO2peak increased following CR (p for interaction <0.001). The socioeconomic gap in secondary outcomes was unaffected by CR. The use of evidence-based medication was good in all socioeconomic groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found a strong socioeconomic gradient in VO2peak and cardiovascular risk factors that was unaffected or worsened after CR. To address inequity in cardiovascular health, the individual adaption of CR according to socioeconomic needs should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kjesbu et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Coronary heart disease or heart valve surgery (n=1,626). Educational level (basic, intermediate, high) vs. High educational level was evaluated on Exercise capacity (peak oxygen consumption [VO2peak]) (p=<0.001). The socioeconomic gap in exercise capacity (VO2peak) between patients with basic versus high education widened following cardiac rehabilitation (P for interaction <0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: