Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation in patients aged ≥65 years was associated with a reduction in the proportion of patients with ≥3 uncontrolled risk factors from 58.4% at baseline to 40.1% at 1 year (p<0.0001).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the sustainable effects of cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients.
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve peak oxygen uptake and risk factor control in elderly patients with coronary artery disease or heart valve replacement?
Observational (n=1,633)
Yes
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve peak oxygen uptake and risk factor control in elderly patients with coronary artery disease or heart valve replacement?
Cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients improves exercise capacity and risk factor control, though a significant proportion remain with uncontrolled risk factors at 1 year.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support risk factor control with cardiac rehab in elderly patients; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm benefits.
Aims The European Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Elderly (EU-CaRE) HORIZON 2020 project compares the sustainable effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in elderly patients. Methods and results A total of 1633 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or heart valve replacement (HVR), with or without revascularization, aged 65 or above, who participated in CR were included. Peak oxygen uptake (VO 2peak ), smoking, body mass index, diet, physical activity, serum lipids, psychological distress and medication were assessed before and after CR (T0 and T1) and after 12 months (T2). Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery or surgical HVR had lower VO 2peak at T0 and a greater increase to T1 and T2 (2.8 and 4.4 ml/kg/min, respectively) than CAD patients undergoing percutaneous or no revascularization (1.6 and 1.4 ml/kg/min, respectively). After multivariable adjustment, earlier CR uptake was associated with greater improvements in VO 2peak . The proportion of CAD patients with three or more uncontrolled risk factors declined from 58.4% at T0 to 40.1% at T2 ( p < 0.0001). Psychological distress scores all improved and adherence to medication was overall good at all sites. There were significant differences in risk factor burden across sites, but no CR program was superior to others. Conclusions The outcomes of VO 2peak in CR programs across Europe seemed mainly determined by timing of uptake and were maintained or even further improved at 1-year follow-up. Despite significant improvements, 40.1% of CAD patients still had three or more risk factors not at target after 1 year. Differences across sites could not be ascribed to characteristics of the CR programs offered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prescott et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease or heart valve replacement (n=1,633). Cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Proportion of CAD patients with three or more uncontrolled risk factors (p=<0.0001). Cardiac rehabilitation in patients aged ≥65 years was associated with a reduction in the proportion of patients with ≥3 uncontrolled risk factors from 58.4% at baseline to 40.1% at 1 year (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: