Key result
Improvement in aerobic capacity during cardiac rehabilitation was associated with significantly higher chronotropic response (72.7% vs 48.2%) and heart rate recovery (21.0 vs 15.8 bpm).
Why the study?
Is improvement in aerobic capacity during cardiac rehabilitation associated with autonomic adaptations in patients with coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=90)
Is improvement in aerobic capacity during cardiac rehabilitation associated with autonomic adaptations in patients with coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 72.7% vs 48.2%
p-value: p=<0.01
Improvements in aerobic capacity following exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients are associated with positive adaptations in autonomic function.
May link aerobic gains to autonomic recovery in CAD rehab; leaves open causality and outcome impact.
It has been previously shown in patients with heart failure that exercise-based rehabilitation programmes may improve functional capacity and autonomic response. The aim of this study was to investigate this issue further by evaluating whether an association exists between autonomic adaptations and improvements of aerobic capacity in a general population of coronary artery disease patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. Ninety consecutive patients (age 60 ± 11 years) attended a rehabilitation programme of moderate continuous training (25 ± 8 sessions, 2–3 sessions/week). Functional capacity expressed as oxygen uptake (peak VO2) and autonomic function expressed as chronotropic response and heart rate recovery were evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise tests before and after the rehabilitation programme. According to the expected mean increase in functional capacity, coronary artery disease patients were divided into two groups: those who improved peak VO2 by more than 2.6 ml/kg/min (R group) and those who did not (NR group). Effects of the rehabilitation programme were compared in R and NR groups. The number and intensity of exercise sessions did not differ between R (N = 39) and NR (N = 51) groups. However, only R patients improved chronotropic response (R: from 45.1 ± 16.9% to 72.7 ± 34.1%, P < 0.01; NR: from 49.3 ± 18.6% to 48.2 ± 36.5%, P = NS) and heart rate recovery (R: from 16.9 ± 7.0 bpm to 21.0 ± 8.7 bpm, P < 0.01; NR: from 15.2 ± 9.9 bpm to 15.8 ± 8.5 bpm, P = NS). After training both chronotropic response and heart rate recovery were significantly higher in R than NR patients. The improvement in aerobic capacity of coronary artery disease patients following exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes is associated with positive adaptations of autonomic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lazzeroni et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in coronary artery disease (n=90). Improvement in peak VO2 > 2.6 ml/kg/min vs. Improvement in peak VO2 ≤ 2.6 ml/kg/min was evaluated on Chronotropic response after rehabilitation (p=<0.01). Improvement in aerobic capacity during cardiac rehabilitation was associated with significantly higher chronotropic response (72.7% vs 48.2%) and heart rate recovery (21.0 vs 15.8 bpm).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: