Key result
Preliminary experience of left bundle branch pacing using a standard stylet-driven lead was described in two case reports.
Why the study?
Right ventricular apical pacing can lead to pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, prompting the use of physiological pacing such as left bundle branch pacing.
Case Report (n=2)
This report describes preliminary experience with left bundle branch pacing using a standard stylet-driven lead in two patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support feasibility of stylet-driven leads for LBBP; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice.
Right ventricular (RV) apical pacing has been demonstrated to be potentially harmful, leading to pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in about one-fifth of patients.1 To avoid pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, physiological pacing has been advocated as a possible solution and His bundle pacing (HBP) has played a prominent role over the last number of years,2 together with the more recent approach of pacing the left bundle branch (LBB).3 These 2 modalities of stimulating the heart have merged together in a new definition of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zanon et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Pacing indication (n=2). Left bundle branch pacing by standard stylet-driven lead was evaluated. Preliminary experience of left bundle branch pacing using a standard stylet-driven lead was described in two case reports.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: