Key result
The omission of gentamicin from the biologic envelope hydration solution was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of CIED infection (OR 3.0) compared to solutions containing gentamicin.
Why the study?
The relationship between and potential benefits associated with guideline-recommended pre-operative intravenous antibacterial prophylaxis in combination with antibacterial envelopes had not been characterized.
Does the use of gentamicin in biologic envelope hydration solutions reduce infection risk in patients receiving CIEDs?
Observational (n=1,102)
Yes
Does the use of gentamicin in biologic envelope hydration solutions reduce infection risk in patients receiving CIEDs?
The use of gentamicin in biologic envelope hydration solutions, along with adjunct IV antibiotics, may significantly reduce infection risk during CIED procedures.
Envelopes without IV prophylaxis may not suffice to lower CIED infection risk; leaves open optimal combined strategy in non-randomized data.
Background: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is a potentially serious complication of CIED procedures. Infection risk mitigation includes using guideline-recommended pre-operative intravenous antibacterial prophylaxis (IV ABX). The use of antibiotic-eluting CIED envelopes has also been shown to reduce infection risk. The relationship between and potential benefits associated with guideline-recommended IV ABX in combination with antibacterial envelopes have not been characterized. Methods: Biologic envelopes made from non-crosslinked extracellular matrix (ECM) were implanted into 1,102 patients receiving CIEDs. The implanting physician decided patient selection for using a biologic envelope and envelope hydration solution. Observational data was analyzed on IV ABX utilization rates, antibacterial envelope usage, and infection outcomes. Physicians demonstrated preference for hydration solutions containing gentamicin in higher-risk patients, which was found by multivariate analysis to be associated with a threefold reduction in infection risk (OR 3.0, 95% CI, 1.0-10.0). Conclusion: These findings suggest that use of antibiotics, particularly gentamicin, in biologic envelope hydration solution may reduce infection risk, and use of antibacterial envelopes without adjunct IV ABX may not be sufficient to reduce CIED infections. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [NCT02530970].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deering et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=1,102). Omission of gentamicin in biologic envelope hydration solution vs. Gentamicin in biologic envelope hydration solution was evaluated on Any major or minor infection (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.0-10.0, p=0.083). The omission of gentamicin from the biologic envelope hydration solution was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of CIED infection (OR 3.0) compared to solutions containing gentamicin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: