Key result
Measurement of the peripheral pulse by healthcare professionals demonstrated 96.5% sensitivity and 94.0% specificity for detecting atrial fibrillation compared with continuous ECG.
Why the study?
Does measurement of the peripheral pulse accurately detect atrial fibrillation in patients after acute ischemic stroke?
Cross-Sectional (n=256)
Blinded
No
Does measurement of the peripheral pulse accurately detect atrial fibrillation in patients after acute ischemic stroke?
Peripheral pulse measurement is a highly specific, noninvasive first-step screening tool to guide ECG diagnostics for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support pulse palpation for AF screening in practice; leaves open prospective validation before guideline changes.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of measurement of the peripheral pulse (MPP) at the radial artery as a simple, noninvasive screening tool for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) in patients after acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-six patients with acute ischemic stroke and the patients' relatives at a tertiary stroke center were prospectively included. Participants were instructed for characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) in MPP using standardized educational material. Measurements of participants as well as a health care professional were then compared with simultaneous blinded ECG to evaluate diagnostic accuracy parameters. RESULTS: MPP by the health care professional or patients' relatives had a diagnostic sensitivity of 96.5% and 76.5%, respectively, with 94.0% and 92.9% specificity for the detection of AF. Self-measurements were reliably performed by 89.1% of competent patients with a diagnostic sensitivity of 54.1% and 96.2% specificity. False-positive results were limited to 6 cases (2.7%) with a positive predictive value of 76.9% and a negative predictive value of 90.0%. CONCLUSION: With a low rate of false-positive results, MPP offers an easy, ubiquitously available, noninvasive, first-step screening tool to guide ECG diagnostics for pAF after ischemic stroke. The data warrant a prospective trial evaluating the efficacy of MPP-guided ECG diagnostics in secondary prevention after stroke, which is now underway. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that MPP by patients or relatives accurately distinguishes AF from normal heart rhythm as compared with continuous ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kallmünzer et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute ischemic stroke (n=256). Measurement of the peripheral pulse (MPP) vs. Continuous ECG was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the detection of atrial fibrillation. Measurement of the peripheral pulse by healthcare professionals demonstrated 96.5% sensitivity and 94.0% specificity for detecting atrial fibrillation compared with continuous ECG.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: