Key result
End-diastolic wall stress index (σi,ED < 1.64) was the single best independent predictor of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, yielding 94.7% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity (AUC 0.947).
Why the study?
Does end-diastolic wall stress index derived from cardiac MRI accurately differentiate HCM patients from controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=38)
No
Does end-diastolic wall stress index derived from cardiac MRI accurately differentiate HCM patients from controls?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.947
p-value: p=<0.001
End-diastolic wall stress index derived from cardiac MRI is a highly sensitive and specific mechanical biomarker for diagnosing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Should not yet change HCM diagnostic practice; leaves open prospective validation of CMR wall stress metrics.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients present altered myocardial mechanics due to the hypertrophied ventricular wall and are typically diagnosed by the increase in myocardium wall thickness. This study aimed to quantify regional left ventricular (LV) shape, wall stress and deformation from cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images in HCM patients and controls, in order to establish superior measures to differentiate HCM from controls. A total of 19 HCM patients and 19 controls underwent cardiac MR scans. The acquired MR images were used to reconstruct 3D LV geometrical models and compute the regional parameters (i.e., wall thickness, curvedness, wall stress, area strain and ejection fraction) based on the standard 16 segment model using our in-house software. HCM patients were further classified into four quartiles based on wall thickness at end diastole (ED) to assess the impact of wall thickness on these regional parameters. There was a significant difference between the HCM patients and controls for all regional parameters (P < 0.001). Wall thickness was greater in HCM patients at the end-diastolic and end-systolic phases, and thickness was most pronounced in segments at the septal regions. A multivariate stepwise selection algorithm identified wall stress index at ED (σi,ED) as the single best independent predictor of HCM (AUC=0.947). At the cutoff value σi,ED <1.64, both sensitivity and specificity were 94.7%. This suggests that the end-diastolic wall stress index incorporating regional wall curvature—an index based on mechanical principle—is a sensitive biomarker for HCM diagnosis with potential utility in diagnostic and therapeutic assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=38). End-diastolic wall stress index (σi,ED) vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Prediction of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (AUC 0.947, p=<0.001). End-diastolic wall stress index (σi,ED < 1.64) was the single best independent predictor of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, yielding 94.7% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity (AUC 0.947).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: