Key result
The STAR multicomponent care transitions program did not reduce 30-day hospital readmissions (18.3% vs 14.3% concurrent) and increased 30-day ED visits by 5.0 percentage points (P=0.020).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to test the effectiveness of a multicomponent care transition intervention for hospitalized patients aged 75 years and older at high risk for hospital readmissions, return emergency department visits, and related complications.
Does a multicomponent care transitions program reduce 30-day hospital readmissions and returns to the ED in high-risk hospitalized older adults aged 75 years and older?
Observational (n=8,936)
No
Does a multicomponent care transitions program reduce 30-day hospital readmissions and returns to the ED in high-risk hospitalized older adults aged 75 years and older?
Absolute Event Rate: 18.3% vs 14.3%
A multicomponent care transitions program for high-risk older adults was ineffective at reducing 30-day readmissions or ED visits, highlighting significant implementation challenges in real-world settings.
May support targeted transitions in high-risk elderly inpatients; hypothesis-generating, needs RCTs before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To test the effectiveness of a multicomponent care transition intervention targeted at hospitalized patients, aged 75 years and older, at high risk for hospital readmissions, return emergency department (ED) visits, and related complications. DESIGN: Implementation as a quality improvement program with propensity-matched preintervention and concurrent comparison groups over a 12-month period. SETTING: A 400-bed community teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients, aged 75 years and older, admitted to non-intensive care unit beds who met specific high-risk criteria. The intervention group included 202 patients, and the concurrent and preintervention comparison groups included 4142 and 4592 patients, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were 30-day hospital readmissions and returns to the ED; 7-day readmissions and ED visits were secondary measures. RESULTS: Among the 202 patients enrolled in the "Safe Transitions for At-Risk Patients" ("STAR") program, 37 (18.3%) were readmitted within 30 days, in contrast to 14.3% and 14.6% in the concurrent and preintervention comparison groups, respectively. Rates for 30-day return ED visits that did not result in hospitalization were 10.9% in the intervention group, and 7.2% and 7.9% in the comparison groups. STAR patients had greater 30-day ED use than patients in the preintervention comparison group (5.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval = 0.8-9.3 percentage points; P = .020). Implementation challenges included suboptimal involvement of the participating hospital and post-acute care organizations and a relatively high proportion of patients who did not receive the intervention as planned, despite agreeing to participate before leaving the hospital. CONCLUSION: A multicomponent care transitions intervention targeting high-risk patients, aged 75 years and older, admitted to a community teaching hospital was not effective in reducing 30- or 7-day readmissions or return ED visits. Our implementation experience offers many lessons for future programs for similar high-risk geriatric populations. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2634-2642, 2019.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huckfeldt et al. (2019) conducted an observational in High-risk hospitalized older adults (n=8,936). Safe Transitions for At-Risk Patients (STAR) program vs. Concurrent and preintervention usual care was evaluated on 30-day hospital readmissions. The STAR multicomponent care transitions program did not reduce 30-day hospital readmissions (18.3% vs 14.3% concurrent) and increased 30-day ED visits by 5.0 percentage points (P=0.020).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: