Key result
Older adults who disagreed with a deprescribing recommendation were more interested in additional communication than those who strongly disagreed (28.2% vs 14.2%; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Little is known about why older adults decline deprescribing recommendations because interventional studies rarely capture these reasons.
What factors are important to older adults who disagree with a deprescribing recommendation?
Cross-Sectional (n=899)
Yes
What factors are important to older adults who disagree with a deprescribing recommendation?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.2% vs 14.2%
p-value: p=<.001
Older adults who disagree with deprescribing recommendations may be more open to it with improved communication, alternative strategies, and consideration of their preferences, especially if they do not strongly disagree.
Highlights patient concerns in deprescribing discussions; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Importance: Little is known about why older adults decline deprescribing recommendations, primarily because interventional studies rarely capture the reasons. Objective: To examine factors important to older adults who disagree with a deprescribing recommendation given by a primary care physician to a hypothetical patient experiencing polypharmacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This online, vignette-based survey study was conducted from December 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, with participants 65 years or older in the United Kingdom, the US, Australia, and the Netherlands. The primary outcome of the main study was disagreement with a deprescribing recommendation. A content analysis was subsequently conducted of the free-text reasons provided by participants who strongly disagreed or disagreed with deprescribing. Data were analyzed from August 22, 2022, to February 12, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Attitudes, beliefs, fears, and recommended actions of older adults in response to deprescribing recommendations. Results: Of the 899 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 71.5 (4.9) years; 456 participants (50.7%) were men. Attitudes, beliefs, and fears reported by participants included doubts about deprescribing (361 [40.2%]), valuing medications (139 [15.5%]), and a preference to avoid change (132 [14.7%]). Valuing medications was reported more commonly among participants who strongly disagreed compared with those who disagreed with deprescribing (48 of 205 [23.4%] vs 91 of 694 [13.1%], respectively; P < .001) or had personal experience with the same medication class as the vignette compared with no experience (93 of 517 [18.0%] vs 46 of 318 [12.1%], respectively; P = .02). Participants shared that improved communication (225 [25.0%]), alternative strategies (138 [15.4%]), and consideration of medication preferences (137 [15.2%]) may increase their agreement with deprescribing. Participants who disagreed compared with those who strongly disagreed were more interested in additional communication (196 [28.2%] vs 29 [14.2%], respectively; P < .001), alternative strategies (117 [16.9%] vs 21 [10.2%], respectively; P = .02), or consideration of medication preferences (122 [17.6%] vs 15 [7.3%], respectively; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, older adults who disagreed with a deprescribing recommendation were more interested in additional communication, alternative strategies, or consideration of medication preferences compared with those who strongly disagreed. These findings suggest that identifying the degree of disagreement with deprescribing could be used to tailor patient-centered communication about deprescribing in older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weir et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Polypharmacy (n=899). Disagreeing with a deprescribing recommendation vs. Strongly disagreeing with a deprescribing recommendation was evaluated on Interest in additional communication (p=<.001). Older adults who disagreed with a deprescribing recommendation were more interested in additional communication than those who strongly disagreed (28.2% vs 14.2%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: