Key result
In an open urban population of men aged 25-64 years, 70.3% exhibited hostility, and high levels of hostility predominated among those with somatic risk factors for coronary heart disease.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,000)
No
High levels of hostility are highly prevalent among working-age men and are associated with somatic risk factors for coronary heart disease, highlighting the potential value of incorporating psychosocial evaluation into cardiovascular risk screening.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May link hostility to CHD risk factors in men 25–64; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The aim of the work was to establish the association of the prevalence of somatic risk factors of coronary heart disease and levels of hostility in an open urban population in men 25–64 years. Material and Methods . The one-time cross-sectional study was conducted among males (1000 people, 250 people in the age groups of 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64 years) on a representative sample formed by a “random” mathematical method from electoral administrative lists of the Central District of Tyumen. The response was 85.0%. The analysis of the study included the prevalence of somatic risk factors for coronary heart disease according to the unified evaluation criteria (arterial hypertension, body mass index, HCS, HTG, hypoCS LHD) and the prevalence of low, medium, high levels of hostility on the WHO MONICA-psychosocial questionnaire. The results of the study showed that 70.3% of men aged 25-64 with hostility were identified in the open population, with a high level of hostility in theTyumen population prevailing and amounted to 46.6%, the medium hostility level was 23.7%.Tyumen population is characterized by a high prevalence of such somatic risk factors for coronary heart disease, such as arterial hypertension, HCS, body mass index, which increases significantly from a young age and with the highest values in the older age group. In the open population in men aged 25–64 in groups with the presence of somatic risk factors of coronary heart disease, high levels of hostility predominate. Discussion. An analysis of the results suggests that the epidemiological criteria for the psychosocial risk factors of cardiovascular disease, including hostility, will be used in conducting preventive examinations of the population, mainly in conjunction with somatic risk factors for cardiovascular disease, to form “risk groups” among men of working age who are subject to follow-up and in-depth examination. Conclusion. Tyumen population is characterized by a high prevalence of such somatic risk factors for coronary heart disease, such as arterial hypertension, HCS, body mass index, and in groups with the presence of somatic risk factors of coronary heart disease prevail high levels of hostility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kayumova et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease risk factors (n=1,000). Hostility and somatic risk factors was evaluated on Prevalence of somatic risk factors for coronary heart disease and levels of hostility. In an open urban population of men aged 25-64 years, 70.3% exhibited hostility, and high levels of hostility predominated among those with somatic risk factors for coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: